As published for the first time, this digital collage was accompanied by a caption introducing it as Much in common (reminder).[1] Curiously enough, such words don’t constitute the title of this artwork, which is actually A Lot in Common.
Not all my works receive a title as soon as they have been finished: sometimes they have the title put before the work is initiated, other times they receive it in the making, and in other opportunities they have it put once the work has been finished. This last case is valid to A Lot in Common, a composition also recalling Kandinsky’s words on the artwork as having an autonomous life.[2]
In A Lot in Common, the motifs and their interplay may possibly appear enigmatic. The crown of thorns, for example, has its referent in the Gospel, but its use in this composition has to do with the creation of new meanings. After all, not every single crown of thorns is necessarily that of Jesus.
Different layers of meaning are suggested in A Lot in Common via the use of a hybrid motif—a figure “7” that can also be read as the letter “J.” Because of its double nature, this hybrid symbol doesn’t simply refer to, for instance, the seven days of the Creation or God’s name (Jehovah, Jesus, etc.). Notably, it refers to both of these notions at once, rejecting the exclusive idea of “either this or that,” to embrace a rather inclusive one—“both this and that.”
Thus, the central symbol of A Lot in Common has to do with the seven days of Creation” and God’s name simultaneously (both-and phenomenon in the visual arts). Apart from its biblical symbolism, the figure “7” suggests human creativeness and a seven-day routine. Surrounded by thorns, the “7-J” motif evokes Jerusalem, the holy city, with a wall of thorns, which in theory is supposed to protect her, but as a matter of fact hurts her: the wall of thorns stands for segregation, ghetto, divorce, isolation, suffering, sacrifice, impotence.
All the pain connected to monotheism inhabits A Lot in Common, embracing that of Jehovah, Jesus, Jamal.
As today pain prevails in that city, sometimes seen as the legendary center of the world,[3], pain becomes quite general and reverberates in each of us. Jazmín, Jonathan, Juliana, James, Jessica, Justine, Jacques, José, Judith, Jürgen, Japheth, Juanito... Jerusalem longs for Justice.
That is why Jerusalem and us have “A Lot in Common.”
References
Digital collage text. "Metaphasia. An inability to perceive metaphor" (Douglas Coupland, Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture, 1991).
[1] See Counterpoint, 11 November 2006
[2] See The Wisdom of Kandinsky, 15 November 2006
[3] On Jerusalem as the center of the world, see Impromptu, 7 July 2007
Mariano Akerman , “Metaphasia” (digital composition) and “The Wall of Thorns” (text) © 31 Aug 2007 Akermariano. All rights reserved.
Comments
La metáfora, como simbología artística y psíquica, admite multiplicidad de interpretaciones, todas ellas válidas para la realidad mental que se las plantea... Comprendo el desarrollo que exponés, y considero que la percepción es, precisamente, tan amplia, tan ambigua y llena de significados, como cantidad de seres sean capaces de conectar imagen y sensación. Esencia de la metáfora artística, esencia de lo Inconsciente: mostrar y ocultar a la vez... Cada uno integra la manifestación del arte de manera diferente según el ordenamiento de su realidad interior...Por eso, justifico...por qué no “ f “? Fe y Fuerza. Es lo que a mí me sugirió. Una Fuerza sutil como la efe lánguida, y agresiva en las espinas. Una Fe aguda y tenue al mismo tiempo, avalada y protegida por la corona espiculada. Más y lo mismo. Sincronicidad. Reflejo del esfuerzo que supone sustentar la Fe. Saluditos! Adriana [HUH]
Estamos totalmente de acuerdo: cada uno de nosotros integra la obra de arte a su manera y según el entendimiento de su propia realidad interior. Me gustan tus palabras porque ellas abren nuevas puertas. No olvido que la tarea del artista es la de mostrar y ocultar a la vez.
x_morawit. Siempre leo tus artículos, que me sorprenden cada vez más. Mi favorito es "Wall of Thorns", vos sabes que me pierden la simbología y la metáfora. Una maravilla. Te quiero siempre, Adriana.
1 comment:
Aunque no lo creas siempre leo tus artículos, que me sorprenden cada vez más. Me gusta mucho el trabajo sobre Linneaus, y me encanta tu resumen de vida de las reflexiones de ultramar, con los recuerdos de tu tía y la fachada del templo de inclusión posmoderno, que me retrotrae a las clases de forma y comunicación. Igualmente mi favorito es "Wall of Thorns", vos sabes que me pierden la simbología y la metáfora. I'm myself continente y contenido, la creación misma respirando. Los artículos me encantan. Una maravilla.
Post a Comment